It's an interesting article but it's a bit problematic to suggest the REM (very little new tunnelling, mostly conversion of existing track) is a comparable project to the 100% tunnelled SRL
Yeah, I understand that. I was just making a broad point that the SRL seems excessively expensive. The idea was to inspire the government to think how it could lower costs.
It's an interesting article but it's a bit problematic to suggest the REM (very little new tunnelling, mostly conversion of existing track) is a comparable project to the 100% tunnelled SRL
Yeah, I understand that. I was just making a broad point that the SRL seems excessively expensive. The idea was to inspire the government to think how it could lower costs.